What to do with SS of hackers

I have been compiling the list and SS of hackers when I see them. There are about 5 members in our guild have been helping me to do this. So if you got an SS and not sure what to do, here are several ways:

1. Up load to a image host server, and send to Nexon that link.

2. Save the image under Jpeg. The file name is the hackers IGN and send it to me. Katsu_Nguyen@yahoo.com

There are many hackers that never got caught and still on rank. Everytime there is a new member, I always check my list. My list has about 350 names. It still too small compare to the number of hackers outhere. But I still try. Help me guys.

We let JoeCurse join us many times, and we never expelled him cos of hacking... Plus there is something called Name change now... i have a few pics, ill send em to you when i get home.

tomichiwar wrote:

We let JoeCurse join us many times, and we never expelled him cos of hacking... Plus there is something called Name change now... i have a few pics, ill send em to you when i get home.

We let JoeCrused in before I knew he was hacker. Then after 40mins of searching Bellardia for evident, I expelled him Tom.

Now come to the point: Should we expell any member that being accused of hacking by a JR? Do we need to get more evident or we are completely trust on our Jrs? I will post this in Jr conner so you guys can vote.

THANK YOU KAT...I got 15 names and 13 SS of hackers at spiders on Saturday (when I was trying to lvl before the Zrun on Sunday).
Since it took me until 30 minutes before the Zrun to lvl (THANK YOU ROB AND CHINNY!!! :D), I never got the chance to send them to Nx.

I will try to do it tonight after work.

As for expelling....just from what I have seen happen in the past (and I am sure Dani will agree with me here), I think there should be some sort of evidence first, then the JRs should approach the suspected person and discuss the situation (I believe there should be at least half of the JRs involved with discussion before they talk to the accused person).

I would hope that more than 2 or 3 JRs would be there for the discussion too. This way, majority of the JRs are aware of the situation and should be able to come to a unbiased decision based on the circumstances.

This way, when the JRs expel someone for hacking, they would not have to explain themselves, to the guild, or to other JRs. The evidence would speak for itself and the JRs would have gotten the story from both sides.

Now as a side note, the JRs may also want to have the person that provided the evidence at the meeting with the accused or make sure the person is available for joining them, in case there is debate to the evidence.

I have some screenies that I need to take care of.