Google vs Microsoft

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090224.wgtgoogmsft0224/BNStory/Technology/home

What are your views on it? I actually joined the site just so I could post my reply, i am Steve from Kitchener Canada, the 29th poster. you can read it if you want xP

BTW: im a firefox user.

I 100% agree with you Steve. Microsoft has made a relatively good product called Windows and come with it are bunch of softwares that make Windows completed. If you make Chrome to compete with Explorer, why not pay for other company to install it into new PC, or pay some money to advertise them so ppl can be aware about your product better? Now they want to remove Explorer, whats next? Note pad? Solitaire? Media player?.....lame, so lame.

Now if they want Chrome install with new PC but Microsoft prohibit PC companies to do that, then they have all their right to sue Microsoft for being monopoly.

Few years ago they force Microsoft to remove Java off Windows, it was lame and now they want to do this. These companies whine like babies. I bet they are lobbying million of dollars to those so called commisioners to look at these lame law suits.

Bill Gates has retired however he's still doing charity works to not just America but also the whole world. His foundation has paid 90% of all immunization medications to all children around the world. If you google Bill Gates foundation, it would come up with tons of charity works that it has done. His charity is so well known, well respected that the 2nd richest person in the world Warren Buffet donated 30 BILLIONS to Gates foundation. Warren himself has his own foundation, but he donated most of his fortune to Bill Gates's Foundation? Thats really something. Now why not other ppl rich like Google owners do the samething? Stop whining lolz